Almanac of law. Issue 11 (2020), pages 208–213.

DOI: 10.33663/2524-017X-2020-11-37

ISSN Print 2524-017X

Sverba Y. I.
Some Approaches to Define the Concept of “Access to Justice”

The article is dedicated to the analysis of the concept of «access to justice». The national legislation, the case law of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine and the European Court of Human Rights, as well as academic papers have been analyzed by the author. The author concludes that there are at least two approaches to define the concept of «access to justice»: broadside and restricted one. The latter is inherent in Ukraine, since the Constitution stipulates that justice in Ukraine is exercised by the courts exclusively.

The case law of the European Court of Human Rights explored in this article demonstrates a broad interpretation of the right to a fair trial, as quasi-judicial authorities are often empowered to make decisions that directly affect a person’s rights and obligations.

Foreign researchers are more progressive in determining the concept of access to justice: the latter is considered as an intention to resolve person’s legal problems, not limited with access to classical judicial protection.

Even though the access to justice concept is not legally defined, it includes the core elements as legal awareness of person’s rights; lack of financial barriers to access to the court; the right to free legal aid guaranteed by the state; a fair and independent court; a reasonable time to settle a dispute, as well as the enforcement of the judgment.

The state could ensure the effective access to justice only if all of the said elements are implemented. At the same time, the states have both positive (to provide the right to free legal aid) and negative obligations (not to interfere with court activities, etc.).

Keywords: access to justice, justice, right to a fair trial, rule of law.

References

1. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 17.03.2020 r. № 5-r/2020 u spravi za konstytutsiinoiu skarhoiu Tatkova
   Viktora Ivanovycha shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) okremykh polozhen chastyny
   piatoi statti 190, punktu 1 chastyny pershoi, chastyny tretoi statti 309 Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy.
   [Elektronnyi resurs]. — Rezhym dostupu: https://bit.ly/2UYKGHM
2. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 25.12.1997 r. № 9-zp u spravi za konstytutsiinym zvernenniam
   hromadian Protsenko Raisy Mykolaivny, Yaroshenko Poliny Petrivny ta inshykh hromadian shchodo ofitsiinoho
   tlumachennia statei 55, 64, 124 Konstytutsii Ukrainy (sprava za zvernenniamy zhyteliv mista Zhovti Vody).
   [Elektronnyi resurs]. — Rezhym dostupu: https://bit.ly/3a3eRSl
3. Mokrytska I. Ia. Dostupnist pravosuddia yak shliakh do zabezpechennia prava na sudovyi zakhyst u kryminalnomu
   protsesi: naukovo-teoretychnyi aspekt / I. Ya. Mokrytska // Chasopys Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka
   akademiia». Seriia «Pravo». — 2015. — № 1 (11). — S. 1-13.
4. Ovcharenko O. M. Dostupnist pravosuddia ta harantii yoho realizatsii : мonohrafiia. — Kh. : Pravo, 2008. — 304 s.
5. Sakara N. Iu. Nalezhna sudova protsedura yak element dostupnosti pravosuddia / N. Yu. Sakara // Yurydychna
   Ukraina. — 2004. — № 3. — S. 63–67.
6. Davydenko S. V. Poterpilyi yak subiekt kryminalno-protsesualnoho dokazuvannia: avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd.
   nauk: spets. 12.00.09 «Kryminalnyi protses ta kryminalistyka; sudova ekspertyza» / S. V. Davydenko. — Kharkiv,
   2007. — 20 s.
7.  Buryi V. O. Pravo na dostup do pravosuddia yak odna z peredumov zabezpechennia inshykh prav i svobod liudyny /
   V. O. Buryi // Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Yurydychni nauky. — 2018. — T. 1. — S. 25-28.
8. Dovydas Vitkauskas. Zakhyst prava na spravedlyvyi sud vidpovidno do Yevropeiskoi konventsii z prav liudyny :
   posibnyk dlia yurystiv. — Kyiv : Pronto Print, 2018. — 190 s.
9. Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Right to a fair trial (criminal limb). [Elektronnyi
   resurs]. — Rezhym dostupu: https://bit.ly/2V25CO7
10.  Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Right to a fair trial (civil limb). [Elektronnyi
    resurs]. –Rezhym dostupu:https://bit.ly/3cbf0Vf
11. Access to Justice: A Societal Imperative. Remarks of the Right Honourable Richard Wagner, P.C. Chief Justice
    of Canada. [Elektronnyi resurs]. — Rezhym dostupu: https://bit.ly/3c2DqAi
12. Effective Access to Justice. Study for the PETI Committee. [Elektronnyi resurs]. — Rezhym dostupu: https://bit.
    ly/3cbwota
13. Jon Robins. Access to justice is a fine concept. What does it mean in view of cuts to legal aid?– The Gardian.
    [Elektronnyi resurs]. — Rezhym dostupu: https://bit.ly/2Vrqv4m
14. Rozdumy pro dostup do pravosuddia. Katrina Fanestok, prohramnyi dyrektor, Counter Point (SShA), za materialamy
    Druhoi mizhrehionalnoi konferentsii «Dostup do pravosuddia», m. Kremenchuk, berezen 2001 roku. [Elektronnyi
    resurs]. — Rezhym dostupu: https://bit.ly/2K0YdrK
15.  Access to Justice: practice note. — UNDP. — 09.03.2004. [Elektronnyi resurs]. — Rezhym dostupu: https://bit.
    ly/2Ry3mMq

Yuriy Ivanovych Sverba,
Postgraduate Student, Department of Theory of State and Law,
Institute of State and Law named after V. M. Koretsky, NAS of Ukraine,
State Expert on Legal Institutions Related to Justice,
Directorate of Justice and Criminal Justice, Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

Завантажити PDF