Almanac of law. Issue 12 (2021), pages 94–99.

DOI: 10.33663/2524-017X-2021-12-15

ISSN Print 2524-017X

Sichevliuk V. A.
Interrelation of theoretical concepts of jurisprudence and legal practice (using the example of the category “legal subjectify”)

The article discusses the interrelation between theoretical concepts of jurisprudence and legal practice on the example of the category «legal subjectity». With an indication of real practical situations, the necessity of implementing the relevant theoretical achievements of legal science in the standards of practical legal activity is justified.

It is noted that at the level of practice the integral content of legal categories, principles and other theoretical concepts of jurisprudence is inevitably operationalized and takes the form of terms. At the same time, the requirement for the unambiguity of the latter creates a constant need for practice in interpreting their content. The correct interpretation of the terms involves a combination of the achievements of theory and practical experience. Deviation from this rule leads to errors in terminology and mistakes in the interpretation of law.

Attention is drawn to the need of using in the texts of judicial, administrative, contractual, and other documents the correct wording on the legal subjectity of separated units and governing bodies of legal entities. The contradictions of the notion of «complex legal entity» are also highlighted. Examples are given of how the legislative acts of Ukraine in some cases do not correspond to the basic principles of the legal entity institution, allowing the existence in the internal organizational space of legal entities of other legal entities. It is emphasized that this status of structural subdivisions of organizations and public authorities contradicts the need to ensure their organizational integrity as subjects of law, endowed with a complete kind of legal subjectity, namely «personal legal subjectity».

Keywords: theoretical concepts of jurisprudence, category «legal subjectity», legal entity, personal legal subjectity, structural division of a legal entity.

References

1. Savchenko K. Iu. Yurydychna praktyka v umovakh reformuvannia sudovoi systemy v Ukraini. Aktualni problemy
   vitchyznianoi yurysprudentsii. № 1. 2018. S. 36-38.
2. Baik O. I. Poniattia i katehorii yak osnova nauky podatkovoho prava Ukrainy. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu
   «Lvivska politekhnika». Yurydychni nauky. 2016. № 824. S. 10-13.
3. Tsmots U. O. Metodolohiia doslidzhennia yurydychnoi praktyky yak filosofskoi pravovoi katehorii. Naukovyi visnyk
   Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. 2016. № 3. S. 336-342.
4. Koziubra M. Pryntsypy prava: metodolohichni pidkhody do rozuminnia pryrody ta klasyfikatsii v umovakh
   suchasnykh hlobalizatsiinykh transformatsii. Pravo Ukrainy. 2017. № 11. S. 142-164.
5. Gadzhiev G. A. Ontologiya prava: (kriticheskoe issledovanie yuridicheskogo koncepta dejstvitel’nosti) : monografiya.
   Moskva : Norma; INFRA-M, 2013. S. 15-16.
6. Gruzdev V. S. Pragmatizm kak bazovaya gnoseologicheskaya ustanovka v kontekste stanovleniya amerikanskoj
   yurisprudencii. Gumanitarnyj nauchnyj vestnik. № 2. 2021. S. 207-211.
7. Slovnyk ukrainskoi movу : v 11 tt. / AN URSR. Instytut movoznavstva; za red. I. K. Bilodida. — K. : Naukova dumka,
   1970-1980. Tom 10: T-F/ red. tomu: A. A. Buriachok, H. M. Hnatiuk. — 1979. — 658 s.
8. Antoshkina V. K. Hnoseolohichna pryroda tlumachennia pravovykh norm. Mizhnarodnyi yurydychnyi visnyk:
   aktualni problemy suchasnosti (teoriia ta praktyka). 2019. Vyp. 15. S. 30-39.
9. Dzhems V. Pragmatizm. Novoe nazvanie dlya nekotoryh staryh metodov myshleniya. Populyarnye lekcii po filosofii /
   per. s angl. P. Yushkevicha. Sankt-Peterburg : Shipovnik, 1910. 244 s.
10. Sichevliuk V. A. Evoliutsiia katehorii «pravova subiektnist» (teoretyko-prykladni zasady): monohrafiia. Kyiv : Vyd-vo
    «Iurydychna dumka», 2020. 462 s.
11.  Subiekty pryvatnopravovykh vidnosyn : [monohrafiia] / A. M. Novytskyi, N. B. Novytska, I. V. Chekhovska ta in.;
    za zah. red. A. M. Novytskoho. — Irpin : Universytet DFS Ukrainy, 2019. — 360 s.
12. Kistyakovskij I. A. Ponyatie sub’ekta prav. Zhurnal Ministerstva yusticii. 1903. № 8. S. 115-127.

Sichevlyuk Volodymyr Antonovych,
Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of
Stock Market and Corporate Governance
of the Ukrainian Institute for Stock Market Development
ORCID:0000-0003-1479-941

Завантажити PDF