Almanac of law. Issue 15 (2024), pages 148–154.

DOI: 10.33663/2524-017X-2024-15-148-154

Didych T. О.
Juridical-technological dimension of law-making as a prospective direction of its scientific research

In the article, the author focuses on the expediency of changing the methodological basis of the scientific study of the phenomenon of law-making. It is emphasized that today in legal literature, as a result of the active development of scientific studies of law-making, various approaches to its understanding have developed, which causes not only an increase in the pluralization of its understanding, but is also marked by the ambiguity of its perception and inconsistency of knowledge. It is worth noting that the basis of successful legal research activity is primarily methodological approaches that allow developing a strategy for scientific knowledge of the studied legal phenomenon or process, based on the prevailing perception of it. Such an approach is the most optimal in conditions of multifaceted approaches to understanding the phenomenon or process under investigation. Therefore, the knowledge of law-making as a multifaceted phenomenon, which in legal science is represented by various approaches to understanding, today requires the development of a coherent methodological basis, ensuring a complex integrative approach to its knowledge. An important and functionally demanding modern approach to the knowledge of the phenomena of legal reality, especially those whose content is legal practical activity, is the legaltechnological dimension. It is proven that thanks to it, the relevant legal phenomena and processes can be perceived and characterized from the point of view of a special technological mechanism where various components interact, providing algorithmization of the relevant legal practical activity. Based on the finding of doctrinal approaches to the understanding of legal technologies from the point of view of their methodological significance, it was concluded that the technological vector of knowledge of law-making as a multifaceted phenomenon has a significant cognitive potential, providing appropriate perception and further knowledge of it. It was noted that it will allow: 1) to strengthen historical-legal and comparative-legal studies of law-making; 2) to optimize the methodological provision of scientific knowledge of law-making through the prism of a complex of relevant legal technologies; 3) focus attention on the legal provision of law-making, both at the international legal and national level; 4) to improve the conceptual and categorical legal apparatus of science and the science of legal theory; 5) to strengthen the research of individual varieties of law-making, laying the basis of their separation, including legal-technological features of law-making, etc.

Key words: method, methodology, law-formation, law-making, legislative activity, legal technologies.

References

1. Manko D. H. (2020) Tekhnolohii ta alhorytmy yurydychnoi diialnosti: dys. … dok. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.01.
   Odesa. 460 s.
2. Chvankin S. A. (2021) Informatsiini tekhnolohii u dokazuvanni v tsyvilnomu protsesi: teoretychni ta praktychni
   aspekty: dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.03. Odessa. 520 s.
3. Superson O. O. (2024) Yurydychni tekhnolohii pidhotovky sudovykh rishen: teoretyko-pravovi ta praktychni
   aspekty: dys. … d-ra fil. za spets. 081. Kyiv. 225 s.
4. Hunko N. Iu. (2020) Zminy ta dopovnennia do zakoniv Ukrainy: zahalnoteoretychni ta tekhniko-tekhnolohichni
   pytannia: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.01. Lviv. 230 s.
5. Zavalna Zh. V., Starynskyi M. V. (2006) Profesiini navychky yurysta: navch. posib. Sumy: Universalna knyha.
   160 s.
6. Krasnytska A. V. (2006) Yurydychni dokumenty: tekhnika skladannia, oformlennia ta redahuvannia: posibnyk.
   2-e vyd., dopov. i pererobl. Kyiv: Parlamentske vyd-vo. 528 s.
7. Kryzhanovskyi A. F. (2012) Yurydychna tekhnolohiia yak innovatsiinyi vektor u pidhotovtsi pravnykiv. Aktualni
   hrani zahalnoteoretychnoi yurysprudentsii: monohrafiia / Yu. M. Oborotov, V. V. Zavalniuk, V. V. Dudchenko
   ta in.; za red. Yu. M. Oborotova. Odesa: Feniks. 492 s.
8. Onyshchuk I. I. (2014) Tekhnika yurydychnoho pysma v normatyvno-pravovykh aktakh: monohrafiia IvanoFrankivsk: Laboratoriia akademichnykh doslidzhen pravovoho rehuliuvannia ta yurydychnoi tekhniky. IvanoFrankivsk. 228 s.
9. Panov M. I. Tochnist pravovykh norm yak neobkhidna umova yakosti pravotvorennia. Yurydychna tekhnika.
   URL: http://legaltechnique.org/
10. Paterylo I. V. (2014) Instrumenty diialnosti publichnoi administratsii: sutnist ta zmist. Naukovyi visnyk
    Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo. Vyp. 27(2). S. 174–178.
11. Didych T. O. (2010) Pravotvorchist: problemy praktyky. Diia prava: intehratyvnyi aspekt: Monohrafiia / Kol.
    avtoriv; Vidp. red. N. М. Onishchenko. Kyiv: Vyd-vo «Iurydychna dumka». S. 217–240.
12. Pro pravotvorchu diialnist: Zakon Ukrainy vid 24.08.2023 r. № 3354-IX. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/
    laws/show/3354-20#Text

Taras Olehovych Didych,
Professor of the Department of Theory and History of Law and State
Teaching and Scientific Institute of Law
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv,
Doctor of Law, Professor
ORCID: 0000-0002-2442-8138