Almanac of law. Issue 15 (2024), pages 313–320.

DOI: 10.33663/2524-017X-2024-15-313-320

Lapka O. Ya., Semko M. M.
The impact of legal globalization on the formation of judicial law-making in Ukraine

The article provides a theoretical and legal analysis of judicial law-making through the prism of globalization processes. The problems of the impact of legal globalization on the formation of judicial law-making in Ukraine are determined. Based on the analysis of the opinions of scientists, it was concluded that the specific features of judicial law-making are: a special subject of judicial law-making — the court; has a secondary character; acts as an objective process based on the system of already existing legal norms, and not on the subjective will of judges; takes place in the presence of legislative gaps and conflicts; is carried out in specific ways: interpretation, specification of evaluative concepts and terms, application of analogy of law and analogy of law, judicial norm control; is the basis for further court decisions in similar cases. It is a well-founded opinion that judicial law-making is a special type of law-making, which is a process in which judges form new legal principles, establish the interpretation and application of legislation, and resolve legal issues that do not have a clear solution in legislation. As a result of judicial law-making, two types of acts are formed: judicial precedent and regulatory legal act issued by the judiciary.

Key words: legal globalization, law, form of law, court, law-making, judicial law-making, interpretation, judicial precedent, gap, collision.

References

1. Chubko T. P. Hlobalizatsiia: poniattia, vplyv na suchasni derzhavu ta pravo. Forum prava. 2010. № 1. S. 396–
   405.
2. Koziubra M. Sudova pravotvorchist: anomaliia chy imanentna vlastyvist pravosuddia. Pravo Ukrainy. 2016.
   № 10. S. 38‒48.
3. Parkhomenko N. M. Dzherela prava, problemy teorii ta metodolohii. Kyiv: Yurydychna dumka, 2008.
4. Skakun O. Teoriia derzhavy i prava: Pidruchnyk. Kharkiv: Konsum, 2001. 656 s.
5. Khart Kh. L. A. Kontseptsiia prava / Per. z anhl. N. Komarova. Kyiv: Sfera, 1998. 238 s.
6. Shevchuk S. V. Sudova pravotvorchist: svitovyi dosvid i perspektyvy v Ukraini: monohr. Kyiv, 2007. 640 s.
7. Ivaniura I. S., Shevchenko D. V., Sivets A. S. Sudova pravotvorchist: pryrodna osoblyvist pravosuddia chy
   yoho anomaliia? Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu. 2021. Seriia Pravo. Vypusk 67.
   S. 296–301. URL: https://visnyk-juris-uzhnu.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/58.pdf
8. Blacks Law Dictionary Digital, 8th. West Academic. URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20070519134548/
   http://www.westacademic.com/St udents/ProductDetails.aspx?tab=1&productid=137640
9. Filyk N. V., Kalistratov O. O. Osoblyvosti pravo tvorennia v diialnosti sudovykh orhaniv. Yurydychnyi visnyk.
   2012. № 4(25).
10. Solomoniuk O. Zahalnoteoretychni kontseptsii sudovoi pravotvorchosti. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho
    humanitarnoho universytetu. Ser. Yurysprudentsiia. 2016. № 23. S. 57‒60.
11. Stetsyk N. V. Sudova pravotvorchist: zahalnoteoretychna kharakterystyka. Chasopys akademii advokatury
    Ukrainy. 2010. № 9. URL: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/Chaau/2010- 3/10snvpzh.pdf
12. Shevchuk S. Kontseptsiia «suddivskoho aktyvizmu» u konteksti sudovoi pravotvorchosti. Yurydychnyi zhurnal.
    2008. № 12. URL: http://justinian.com.ua/article.php?id=3096
13. Huralenko N. A. Sudova pravotvorchist yak sposib konstruiuvannia pravovoi realnosti. URL: http://lawreview.
    chnu.edu.ua/visnuku/st/550/1.pdf
14. Martynenko O. O. Teoretychni zasady sudovoi pravotvorchosti u kontseptsii yurydychnoho prahmatyzmu:
    avtoref. ... k. iu. n.: 12.00.01 / Kyivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Kyiv, 2016. 20 s.
15. Tymchenko H. P., Kotviakovskyi Yu. O. Do pytannia pro sudovu pravotvorchist v tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi.
    Elektronne naukove vydannia «Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo». URL: http://journal-app.uzhnu.edu.
    ua/article/view/261684/258095
16. Tsyvilnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 18.03.2004 № 1618-IV. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/
    show/1618-15#n6106
17. Kurylo M. P., Yasynok D. M. Zakonodavchi prohalyny ta sudova pravotvorchist: vzaiemozviazok poniat.
    Aktualni problemy vitchyznianoi yurysprudentsii. 2022. № 1. S. 77–82.
18. Komar P. A. Rol sudovoi pravotvorchosti v utverdzhenni pryntsypu verkhovenstva prava: dys. … doktora
    filosofii z haluzi znan 08 «Pravo» za spets. 081 «Pravo» / Donetskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Vasylia
    Stusa. Vinnytsia, 2021. 242 s.
19. Zahurskyi R. R., Hrynevych T. P. Sudova pravotvorchist: sutnisna kharakterystyka. Rozvytok derzhavnosti
    ta prava v Ukraini: realii ta perspektyvy: materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (Lviv,
    17–18 veresnia 2021 r.). Lviv: Zakhidnoukrainska orhanizatsiia «Tsentr pravnychykh initsiatyv», 2021. S. 7‒9. 

Oksana Yaroslavivna Lapka,
Associate Professor of the Department of Theory of State and Law
of the National Academy of Internal Affairs,
Candidate of Law, Associate Professor
ORCID: 0000-0002-7017-1273
Maryna Mykolayivna Semko,
Senior Lecturer of the Department of Theory of State and Law
of the National Academy of Internal Affairs
ORCID: 0009-0007-9070-0199