Almanac of law. Issue 15 (2024), pages 589–597.

DOI: 10.33663/2524-017X-2024-15-589-597

Mikheev M. V.
Administrative and legal provision of administrative conflict and non-conflict proceedings in the EU countries on the example of Germany in comparison with the experience of Ukraine

The paper examines the administrative and legal provision of administrative conflict and non-conflict proceedings in comparison with the experience of Germany. It has been proven that the integration of Ukraine into the European legal space requires a full-scale reform of the legal system based on the principles and standards formed at the panEuropean level. It is extremely necessary to take into account international and European standards when carrying out reforms in public administration, as well as take into account theoretical provisions, doctrines and positive practical experience of foreign countries in the field of administrative conflict proceedings. The initiated administrative-judicial reform, the development of a regulatory framework for the regulation of administrative proceedings, should take place taking into account the EU standards of administrative justice aimed at the settlement of conflict proceedings. The implementation of the experience of European countries in conflict administrative proceedings will not only contribute to the improvement of domestic legislation but will also ensure close correspondence with the EU. The author suggests using Germany’s experience regarding legislation and proceedings in cases of administrative offenses. In the scientific literature, there are different approaches to defining the concept of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses, but in general, researchers agree on the general features of such proceedings and point out that this is a special type of procedural activity, which is regulated by the norms of administrative procedural law, which is carried out by authorized administrative jurisdictional powers of special subjects of public administration regarding consideration and resolution of cases of administrative offenses. Among researchers, there is no unity in views on the classification of administrative proceedings. This is not surprising, since there are a significant number of views on the list of principles for the classification of administrative proceedings. We adhere to the classification of conflict and non-conflict administrative proceedings. Germany’s experience has shown that effective means of administrative protection can be provided through various judicial or legal systems. In the end, it all comes down to having sufficient resources, a stable legal framework and institutions, and training. A separate system of administrative justice by itself will certainly not solve problems in the field of administrative justice. Therefore, today, the Ukrainian legislator has no other way to solve the problem, how to build its autonomous system of administrative law, taking into account both the experience of Ukrainian administrative law from the time of the Ukrainian SSR, and the achievements and mistakes of the EU countries.

Key words: administrative law, administrative process, administrative proceedings, conflicting administrative proceedings, administrative law of foreign countries, administrative law of EU countries, administrative and legal support.

References

1. Shopina I. M. Administratyvno-pravove zabezpechennia ta administratyvno-pravove rehuliuvannia:
   spivvidnoshennia poniat. Elektronne naukove vydannia «Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo». 2023. № 6.
   S. 550–554. DOI https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.06.96
2. Medianyk V. A. Poniattia administratyvno-pravovoho zabezpechennia derzhavnoi sotsialnoi polityky.
   Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal. 2020. № 8. S. 579–581.
3.  Nalyvaiko L. Poniattia ta zmist administratyvno-pravovoho zabezpechennia prav dytyny na bezpechni umovy
   zhyttia. Naukovyi visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. 2023. № 2. S. 8–14.
4. Reznichenko V. O. Poniattia administratyvno-pravovoho zabezpechennia vyshchoi osvity v Ukraini.
   Yurydychna nauka. 2020. № 7 (109). S. 144–149.
5. Chystokletov L., Khytra O. Poniattia administratyvno-pravovoho zabezpechennia ta yoho mekhanizmu. Visnyk
   Natsionalnoho universy-tetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Seriia: Yurydychni nauky. 2020. № 3 (27). S. 173–180.
6.  Yara S. Poniattia administratyvno-pravovoho zabezpechennia vyshchoi yurydychnoi osvity v Ukraini.
   Yurydychna nauka. 2019. № 11(101). T. 2. S. 81–87.
7.  Zavalnyi M. V. Mistse administratyvno-deliktnoho provadzhennia v administratyvnomu protsesi. Forum
   prava. 2008. № 1. S. 140–146.
8.  Dzhafarova M. V. Shchodo pytannia rozuminnia administratyvnoho provadzhennia yak chastyny
   administratyvnoho protsesu. Molodyi vchenyi. 2016. № 12. S. 571–574.
9. Mikheiev M. V. Konfliktni ta nekonfliktni provadzhennia v administratyvnomu protsesi: мonohrafiia. Odesa:
   OLDI-PLIuS, 2021. 248 s.
10. Martynovskyi V. V. Problema klasyfikatsii administratyvno-yurysdyktsiinykh provadzhen. Derzhavne
    budivnytstvo ta mistseve samovriaduvannia. 2012. Vyp. 4. S. 85–91.
11.  Chekh L. L. Poniattia ta sutnist provadzhennia u spravakh pro administratyvni pravoporushennia: pohliad na
    problemu. Pivdennoukrainskyi pravnychyi chasopys. 2021. № 4. S. 105–108.
12.  Lohvynenko B. O. Provadzhennia v spravakh pro administratyvni pravoporushennia u sferi okhorony zdorovia:
    navch. posib. Dnipro: Vydavets Bila K. O., 2020. 106 s.
13.  Paida Yu. Deiaki aspekty pravovoho rehuliuvannia provadzhennia u spravakh pro administratyvni
    pravoporushennia. Naukovyi visnyk publichnoho ta pryvatnoho prava. 2020. № 1. S. 209–220. URL: https://
    doi.org/10.32844/2618-1258.2020.1.37.
14.  Panasiuk O. V. Problemni pytannia onovlennia zmistu administratyvnoi vidpovidalnosti. Naukovyi visnyk
    publichnoho ta pryvatnoho prava vypusk. 2018. 2, tom 2-1. S. 164–167.
15.  Banchuk O. A. Administratyvne pravoporushennia. Velyka ukrainska entsyklopediia. URL: https://vue.gov.ua/
    Administratyvne pravoporushennia (data zvernennia: 1.04.2024).
16. Karsten Veber. Administratyvne pravo ta pravosuddia v Nimechchyni. Rezhym dostupu: URL: https://online.
    zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30951159&pos=5;-90#pos=5;-90
17.  Federal Fees Act (Bundesgebührengesetz, BGebG). URL: https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org/?p=1147
18.  Gesetz über Gebühren und Auslagen des Bundes. URL: https://www.gesetze-iminternet.de/bgebg/
19.  Belova O. I., Bumaha K. Iu. Osoblyvosti pravovoho rehuliuvannia nadannia krainamy yevropy
    administratyvnykh posluh i platy za nykh. Science and development of methods for solving modern problems
    Scientific publications Proceedings of the XXVIII International Scientific and Practical Conference «Science
    and development of methods for solving modern problems», Melbourne, Australia. 232 p. (July 18 — 21, 2023).
    ISBN-979-8-89074-574-3. DOI - 10.46299/ISG.2023.1.28. S. 71–80.
20.  Dirk Ehlers, Hermann Pünder, Michael Fehling. Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht: Band 1: Öffentliches
    Wirtschaftsrecht, 4. Aufl., 2019.
21.  Stober Rolf. Besonderes Wirtschaftsverwaltungsrecht, 14. Aufl., 2007.
22.  Levandovsky A. K voprosu o neobkhodymosty razghranychenyia poniatyi «kaufmann» y «kommersant» v
    pravovoi lyterature. Pravova derzhava. 2020. Vup. 39. S. 32–38.
23.  Robbers Gerhard. Einführung in das deutsche Recht. 6. Aufl., 2017.
24.  Levandovsky A. Khoziaistvenno-admynystratyvnoe pravo Hermanyy kak obrazets reformyrovanyia
    admynystratyvnoho zakonodatelstva v Ukrayne. Zbirnyk. tez dop. stud., aspir. ta zdobuv. — uchasn. 76-yi zvit.
    konf. Odeskoho nats. un-tu imeni I. I. Mechnykova. Sektsiia ekonomichnykh i pravovykh nauk (Odesa, 26–
    28.04.2020). Odesa: Feniks, 2021. C. 13–17. URL: http://dspace.onu.edu.ua:8080/handle/123456789/30941

Mykola Volodymyrovych Mikheyev,
Postgraduate Student at the V. M. Koretsky Institute of State and Law, NAS of Ukraine,
Attorney
ORCID: 0000-0002-5384-5985