“Almanac of Law”

Almanac of law. Issue 16 (2025), pages 233–242.

DOI: 10.33663/2524-017X-2025-16-233-242

Lvova O. L.
The value basis of law enforcement in wartime

The article emphasizes that in the process of implementing legal provisions, it is natural to reflect the value principles which are inherent in Ukrainian society, accepted by it and which contribute to the social good. This issue becomes especially relevant in the process of globalization, and the terrible consequences of Russian military aggression in Ukraine have brought to the surface those values that have always been fundamental and crucial for the future of the Ukrainian nation: a person, his or her life, honor and dignity, family, and security. Without them, it is impossible to effectively implement the law and achieve the purpose of legal regulation.

The values of law are generally understood to mean its ability to serve as an end and a means to meet the socially just needs of individuals and society as a whole, to affirm just and humane principles in the relationship between individuals and authorities, and to act as a force that resists arbitrariness.

It is emphasized that at the present stage, deep conflicts in the process of realization of human rights are revealed, especially when there is a need to protect the very idea of human rights as a natural value, with new ideas and interpretations, especially in matters of morality and spirituality. Using the example of the exercise of the constitutional right to freedom of speech, the article demonstrates a sharp conflict that arose as a result of certain provisions of the newly adopted Law of Ukraine «On Media» which contradicted public expectations and moral principles.

The author emphasizes that in the conditions of war, when the Russian aggressor attempts to genocide the Ukrainian nation, its identity, culture, traditions, honor and dignity of every Ukrainian and his or her fundamental rights to life and security, to family and reproduction, and in the context of the demographic crisis, the State is obliged to take all measures not only to preserve these values, which are the basis of national security, but also to bring to justice persons (or groups of persons) who violate the provisions of the said law. After all, today we can observe the absence of a legal mechanism of legal liability for encroachment on national identity, moral and spiritual principles.

As a conclusion, it is noted that the value principles as the initial foundations in the process of law enforcement are complex in nature and include: 1) legal values of a tangible and intangible nature which law is designed to ensure in the course of its implementation, thus achieving its purpose and social purpose; they include natural human rights (life, health, dignity, security, well-being, etc.), norms of public morality, traditions, spirituality, national identity; 2) general principles of law which facilitate the implementation and ensuring of the most essential legal and universal values.

Key words: morality, human rights, law enforcement, values, principles of law, national identity. 

References

  1. Folkovskyi O. A. Do vyznachennia aksiolohichnoho doslidnytskoho pidkhodu v metodolohii yurysprudentsii. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava. 2008. Vyp. 40. S. 59–64.
  2. Timchenko O. P., Kozii I. V., Pihosh M. A. Diievist pravovoi aksiolohii. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal. № 6/2023. S. 662–665.
  3. Onishchenko N. M. Spryiniattia prava v umovakh demokratychnoho rozvytku: monohrafiia. Kyiv: Yurydychna dumka, 2008. 320 s.
  4. Tokarchyk R. Pro neobkhidnist transformatsii kontseptsii prav liudyny v kontseptsiiu prav zhyttia. Filosofiia prava i zahalna teoriia prava. 2012. № 2. S. 196–215.
  5. Kushnirenko O. H., Slinko T. M. Prava i svobody liudyny ta hromadianyna: navch. posibnyk. Kharkiv: Fakt, 2001. 439 s.
  6. Babkin V. D. Pravo i zakon: spivvidnoshennia. Pravo v systemi sotsialnykh norm: istoryko-yurydychni aspekty: Materialy ХIII istoryko-pravovoi konferentsii (Chernivtsi, 20–22 travnia 2005 r.). Chernivtsi: Ruta, 2005. S. 3–9.
  7. Selivanov V., Didenko N. Pravova pryroda rehuliuvannia suspilnykh vidnosyn. Pravo Ukrainy. 2000. № 10. S. 10–20.
  8. Kelzen H. Chyste pravoznavstvo / per. z nim. O. Mokrovolskoho. Kyiv: Yunivers, 2004. 496 s.
  9. Pakhomov I. Administratyvna reforma: predmet reformuvannia. Pravo Ukrainy. 2004. № 1. S. 3–10.
  10. Khart Kh. L. A. Kontseptsiia prava / per. z anhl. N. Komarova. Kyiv: Sfera, 1998. 236 s.
  11. Zahalna teoriia derzhavy i prava / red. V.V. Kopiechykov. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 2000. 320 s.
  12. Lehka O. V. Realizatsiia norm prava: teoretyko-pravovi aspekty. Pravo i suspilstvo. 2014. № 1. S. 30–33.
  13. Hryshchuk O. V. Liudska hidnist u pravi: aksiolohichnyi aspekt. Aktualni problemy filosofii prava: pravova aksiolohiia: mater. Mizhnar. kruhloho stolu (Odesa, 9 hrudnia 2011 r.). Odesa: Feniks, 2012. S. 101–103.
  14. Zahorui I. S. Poniattia «prava liudyny»: teoretyko-pravovi pidkhody do rozuminnia prav liudyny. Visnyk Luhanskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav im. E. O. Didorenkа. 2016. № 2. S. 66–82.
  15. Bobrovnyk S. V. Kompromis i konflikt u pravi: antropoloho-komunikatyvnyi pidkhid do analizu: monohrafiia. Kyiv: Yuryd. dumka, 2011. 384 s.
  16. Lysenkov S. L. Zahalna teoriia derzhavy i prava. Navch. posibnyk. Kyiv: Yuryskonsult, 2006. 356 s.
  17. Parkhomenko N. Tsinnisni zasady prava ta pravotvorchoi diialnosti v umovakh voiennoho stanu. Optymizatsiia pravotvorchoi diialnosti: teoretyko-pravovi zasady: monohrafiia / za zah. red. N. M. Parkhomenko. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 2025. 512 s.
  18. Lvova O. L. Moralni zasady pravotvorchosti v Ukraini yak faktor yii optymizatsii. Optymizatsiia pravotvorchoi diialnosti: teoretyko-pravovi zasady: monohrafiia / za zah. red. N. M. Parkhomenko. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 2025. 167–191.
  19. Pro osnovni zasady derzhavnoi polityky u sferi utverdzhennia ukrainskoi natsionalnoi ta hromadianskoi identychnosti: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13 hrudnia 2022 roku № 2834-IX. Ofitsiinyi veb-portal Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy «Zakonotvorchist». URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2834-20#Text
  20. Koziubra M. Sotsialna derzhava i sotsialni prava yak tsinnosti konstytutsionalizmu: osnovni vyklyky t napriamy transformatsii v umovakh viiny. Sotsialni prava: vyklyky voiennoho chasu: zb. tez dop. Shostoi Mizhnar. Nauk.-prakt. Konf. «Administratyvna yustytsiia v Ukraini: problemy teorii i praktyky» (Kyiv, 6 lypnia 203 r.). Kharkiv: Pravo, 203. S. 45–49.
  21. Onishchenko N. Pravo liudyny na myr: kontekst sotsialnykh prav. Sotsialni prava: vyklyky voiennoho chasu: zb. tez dop. Shostoi Mizhnar. Nauk.-prakt. Konf. «Administratyvna yustytsiia v Ukraini: problemy teorii i praktyky» (Kyiv, 6 lypnia 203 r.). Kharkiv: Pravo, 203. S. 62–65.
  22. Pro skhvalennia Stratehii demohrafichnoho rozvytku Ukrainy na period do 2040 roku: Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu ministriv Ukrainy vid 30 veresnia 2024 r. № 922-r. Ofitsiinyi sait Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy. URL: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-skhvalennia-stratehii-demohrafichnoho-rozvytku-ukrainy-na-period-do-2040-roku-922r-300924
  23. Linnyk N. V. Prava liudyny yak katehoriia ta tsinnist. Aktualni problemy filosofii prava: pravova aksiolohiia: mater. Mizhnar. kruhloho stolu (Odesa, 9 hrudnia 2011 r.). Odesa: Feniks, 2012. S. 104–106.
  24. Hryshchenko A. V. Pravovyi zakon: pytannia teorii ta praktyky v Ukraini: avtoref. …kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.01. Kyiv, 2002. 18 s.
  25. Skakun O. F. Teoriia derzhavy i prava: pidruchnyk. Kharkiv: Konsum, 2001. 656 s.
  26. Lvova O. L. Pravo zhyve ta diieve (pro tsinnisni oriientatsii prava). Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava. 2007. № 1. S. 11–17.
  27. Proekt zakonu pro instytut reiestrovanykh partnerstv № 9103 vid 13.03.2023. Ofitsiinyi veb-portal Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy «Zakonotvorchist». URL: https://itd.rada.gov.ua/billInfo/Bills/Card/41497