“Almanac of Law”

Almanac of law. Issue 16 (2025), pages 261–267.

DOI: 10.33663/2524-017X-2025-16-261-267

Okuniev I. S.
Unreliability as a manifestation of invalidity in law

The article considers the phenomenon of unreliability as a manifestation of invalidity in law. An analytical view is taken on the definitions of “reliability” and “inreliability” in both general scientific and legal perspectives.

The author argues that inreliability is not merely a characteristic of information or documents, but a legal fact that may serve as a basis for declaring legal acts, transactions, and other legal relationships invalid. The study offers a systematic characterization of the legal consequences stemming from inreliability, distinguishing between their material and procedural aspects. Furthermore, the author emphasizes the insufficiency of legal regulation and the necessity for its improvement and codification in order to enable uniform application of the law and legal certainty in practice.

Inreliability, therefore, emerges as a legally significant phenomenon that guarantees the proper application of legal norms and the restoration of the rights and lawful interests of participants in legal relationships. The paper also clarifies its relation to other legal categories and draws distinctions between inreliability and falsehood in legal terminology.

Key words: inreliability, reliability, invalidity, legal reality, legal act, information, document, legal transaction, evidence.

References

  1. Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy: v 11 t. / AN URSR, In-t movoznavstva imeni O. O. Potebni; redkol.: I. K. Bilodid (holova) ta in. Kyiv: Nauk. dumka, 1970–1980. T. 2: H-Zh / red. tomu: P. P. Dotsenko, L. A. Yurchuk. 1971. 550 c.
  2. Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk / za zah. nauk. red. V. I. Shynkaruk; In-t filosofii im. H. S. Skovorody. Kyiv: Abrys, 2002. 742 s.
  3. Vakariuk L. Osnovni pidkhody do rozuminnia poniattia «informatsiini prava liudyny». Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. 2018. № 2. S. 155–159.
  4. Pro informatsiiu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02 zhovtnia 1992 r. № 2657-XII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2657-12#Text (data zvernennia: 31.03.2025).
  5. Yurydychna entsyklopediia / red. Yu. S. Shemshuchenko ta in.; NAN Ukrainy, In-t derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Koretskoho. Kyiv: Ukrainska entsyklopediia im. M. P. Bazhana, 1998 . T. 2: D-Y. 1999. 741 s.
  6. Lohinova N. I., Drobozhur R. R. Pravovyi zakhyst informatsii: navchalnyi posibnyk. Odesa: Feniks, 2015. 264 s.
  7. Danylchuk L. O. Sutnist definitsii «informatsiia». Pedahohika i psykholohiia profesiinoi osvity. Lviv, 2012. № 5. S. 18–26.
  8. Mykytenko L. A. Paradyhma zabezpechennia prava spozhyvacha na informatsiiu. Zovnishnia torhivlia: ekonomika, finansy, pravo. 2016. № 1. S. 47–55.
  9. Brzhevska Z. M., Haidur H. I., Anosov A. O. Vplyv na dostovirnist informatsii yak zahroza dlia informatsiinoho prostoru. Kiberbezpeka: osvita, nauka, tekhnika. 2018. No 2(2). S. 105–112.
  10. Politanskyi V. S. Pryntsypy informatsiino-pravovykh vidnosyn. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava. 2013. S. 55–60.
  11. Partyko Z. V. Vlastyvosti informatsii. Informatsiia, komunikatsiia, suspilstvo 2017: materialy 6-i Mizhnarodnoi naukovoi konferentsii IKS-2017, 18–20 travnia 2017 roku. Slavske, 2017. S. 136–137.
  12. Ruda T. Dostovirnist dokaziv u tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi SShA ta Ukrainy: porivnialno-pravovyi aspekt. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. 2011. № 87. S. 73–78.
  13. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy vid 28 chervnia 1996 r. № 254k/96-VR. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text (data zvernennia: 31.03.2025).
  14. Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy: v 11 t. / URSR, In-t movoznav. im. O. O. Potebni; redkol.: I. K. Bilodid (holova) ta in. Kyiv: Nauk. dumka, 1970–1980. T. 5: N-O / red. tomu: V. O. Vynnyk, L. A. Yurchuk. 1974. 840 c.
  15. Dotsenko O. M. Sprostuvannia nedostovirnoi informatsii yak sposib zakhystu prava fizychnoi osoby na osobyste zhyttia. Pravo i suspilstvo. 2013. № 6.2. S. 59–63.
  16. Shymon S. I. Poshyrennia nedostovirnoi informatsii: vidpovidalnist za shkodu, zavdanu osobystym nemainovym pravam fizychnoi osoby. Yurydychnyi zhurnal. 2003. № 6. URL: http://www.justinian.com.ua/article.php?id=320.
  17. Lezhukh T. I. Spetsyfika dokazuvannia u spravakh pro zakhystu chesti, hidnosti ta dilovoi reputatsii. Porivnialnoanalitychne pravo. 2013. № 2-3. S. 140–144. URL: http://www.pap.in.ua/3-2_2013/3/Lezhukh%20T.I..pdf.
  18. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 07.12.2021 u spravi № 905/902/20. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/102342551 (data zvernennia: 31.03.2025).
  19. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 23.11.2022 u spravi № 2318/1249/2012. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/107805167 (data zvernennia: 31.03.2025).
  20. Okuniev I. S. Do pytannia pro vydy nediisnosti u pravi. Pravova derzhava: Shchorichnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu derzhavy i prava imeni V. M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy. Vypusk 35. Kyiv, 2024. S. 160–169.
  21. Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 16.01.2003 r. № 435-IV. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/435-15#Text (data zvernennia: 31.03.2025).
  22. Bakhaieva A. S. Pravochyn, yakyi vchyneno pid vplyvom pomylky, obmanu (shakhraistva). Forum prava. 2018. № 1. S. 8–15.
  23. Pro litsenzuvannia vydiv hospodarskoi diialnosti: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02 bereznia 2015 r. № 222-VIII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/222-19#Text (data zvernennia: 31.03.2025).