Укр Eng
+380 (44) 278-80-24
“Almanac of Law”
  1. Home
  2.  ⇒ 
  3. Almanac of law. Issue 16 (2025)
  4.  ⇒ 
  5. Analysis of the Efficiency of Enforcement Proceedings: Theory and Practice

Almanac of law. Issue 16 (2025), pages 433–439.

DOI: 10.33663/2524-017X-2025-16-433-439

Skrybka I. Y.
Analysis of the Efficiency of Enforcement Proceedings: Theory and Practice

Ensuring by the state of effective, and most importantly, real, enforcement of court decisions is an indicator that indicates the state of functioning of the legal system of each state, and activities for such enforcement can be considered an integral part of the rule of law.

In Ukraine, taking into account the fairly frequent reform of the profile legislation in the field of compulsory enforcement of court decisions, the emergence in 2016 of a new institute in this field — the institute of a private executor, the issue of implementing numerous legislative initiatives in practice does not lose its relevance.

Insufficient efficiency of enforcement of court decisions is a serious obstacle to the restoration of violated rights and freedoms of citizens, causes skepticism and distrust of justice among citizens, jeopardizes the stability and development of the business environment (investors and enterprises may begin to avoid interaction with entities that provide enforcement, since they are not sure of the effective protection of their interests). Inefficiency of enforcement of decisions can create legal uncertainty when people do not know what rights they have and whether they can count on their protection, which, in turn, complicates the resolution of disputes; delays in the enforcement of court decisions can lead to additional costs for the state, associated with the need to re-trial the same disputes and attract additional resources. The outlined consequences eloquently indicate that the efficiency of enforcement of court decisions is critically important for ensuring justice and maintaining law and order in society as a whole.

Key words: enforcement of court decisions, effectiveness of enforcement of court decisions, factors of effective enforcement, improvement of the enforcement system, final stage of the judicial process, enforcement service.

References

  1. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 № 254k/96-VR. URL: https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/constitution (data zvernennia: 05.05.2025).
  2. Pro orhany ta osib, yaki zdiisniuiut prymusove vykonannia sudovykh rishen i rishen inshykh orhaniv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 No 1403-VIII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1403-19#Text (data zvernennia: 05.05.2025).
  3. Tymchyshyn A. M. Istorychni peredumovy ta evoliutsiia pryntsypu nezminiuvanosti suddiv. Analitychno porivnialne pravoznavstvo. 2024. № 2. S. 805–809. URL: https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.133 (data zvernennia: 01.05.2025).
  4. Kazarian E. Osoblyvosti obstanovky vchynennia umysnoho vbyvstva z motyviv rasovoi natsionalnoi chy relihiinoi neterpymosti. Pravovi zasoby zabezpechennia ta zakhystu prav liudyny: vitchyznianyi ta zarubizhnyi dosvid: materialy mizhnar. nauk.- prakt. konf. naukovtsiv, molodykh vchenykh ta pravnykiv (m. Kyiv, 18 trav. 2023 r.). Kyiv, 2023. S. 163–165. URL: https://snu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/konferents ya-18.05.2023.pdf#page=163 (data zvernennia: 24.04.2025).
  5. Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod: Konventsiia Rady Yevropy vid 04.11.1950. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text (data zvernennia: 16.01.2025).
  6. Pro vykonavche provadzhennia: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 № 1404-VIII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1404-19#Text (data zvernennia: 10.05.2025).
  7. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 26 chervnia 2013 roku № 5-rp/2013. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v011p71012/paran17%22%20%5Cl%20%22n17%22%20%5Ct%20%22_blank (data zvernennia: 24.04.2025).
  8. Selivanov O. Mizhnarodni standarty vykonannia sudovykh rishen i mekhanizmy ïkh implementatsiï v ukraïnsku pravovu systemu. Pravo Ukraïny. 2024. № 9. S. 121–133. URL: https://doi.org/10.33498/louu-2024-09-121 (data zvernennia: 06.05.2025).
  9. Suleimanova R. Osoblyvosti vykonannia v Ukraini sudovykh doruchen inozemnykh sudiv. Pravove zhyttia suchasnoi Ukrainy: mater. Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (m. Odesa, 17 trav. 2019 r.). Odesa: VD «Helvetyka», 2019. T. 2. S. 610–613. URL: https://dspace.onua.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstream
  10. Iunin O. S. Administratyvno-pravovyi mekhanizm zabezpechennia prymusovoho vykonannia sudovykh rishen i rishen inshykh orhaniv. Pravo i suspilstvo. 2024. № 3. S. 446– 451. URL: https://doi.org/10.32842/2078-3736/2024.3.68 (data zvernennia: 05.05.2025
  11. Khobbi Y., Storozhuk I., Svoboda I., Kuzmenko S., Tymchyshyn A. Reforming Techniques to Combat Organized Crime in the Context in View of Securing. Human Rights and Freedoms. Cuestiones Políticas. 2022. Vol. 40. № 73. URL: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4073.09 (data zvernennia: 06.05.2025).
  12. Suleimanova, S. Comparative Legal Analysis of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Human Rights Protection: Prospects for Europe and the Middle East. Pakistan Journal of Criminology. 2024. Vol. 16. № 3. P. 907–922. URL: https://www.pjcriminology.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/58-Comparative-Legal-Analysis-of-theRole.pdf (data zvernennia: 10.05.2025).
  13. Krupnova L. V., Lytvyn N. A. Vyznachennia chynnykiv, shcho nehatyvno vplyvaiut na efektyvnist administratyvno-protsedurnoï diialnosti u sferi prymusovoho vykonannia sudovykh rishen. Irpinskyy̆ yurydychnyy̆ chasopys. 2021. № 2(4). S. 57–67. URL: https://doi.org/10.33244/2617-4154.2(4).2020.57-67 (data zvernennia: 16.01.2025).
  14. Tsyvilnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 18.03.2004 № 1618-IV. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#Text (data zvernennia: 04.05.2025).
Back to contents