Almanac of law. Issue 17 (2026), pages 189–199.

DOI: 10.33663/2524-017X-2026-17-189-199

Bezzubov D. O.
Implementation of administrative law norms in modern conditions

The article examines contemporary mechanisms for implementing the norms of administrative law in Ukraine, focusing on the profound transformations of public authority driven by wartime conditions, the national security agenda, the intensification of state control and oversight, and the ongoing digital and institutional modernization. It is argued that the implementation of administrative law norms today extends beyond the classical doctrinal categories of compliance, application, execution, and use. The complexity of modern governance, the expansion of crisis-management functions, and the heightened expectations of legal certainty in the public sector have reshaped the very nature of administrative norm-realization.

A central emphasis is placed on the influence of national security challenges on the functioning of administrative law. The study demonstrates that martial law does not diminish the importance of administrative norms; instead, it amplifies their regulatory and organizational value by transforming them into instruments of state resilience. Through the lens of administrative law, the article analyses how public authorities — including defence, intelligence, counterintelligence, cyber security, border protection, and information security institutions — carry out their functions within a strict legal framework, ensuring both operational responsiveness and adherence to the rule of law. Administrative law thus becomes a critical mechanism that upholds state stability, delineates the permissible limits of discretionary action, and ensures accountability in conditions of heightened risk.

The article further explores the interplay between the implementation of administrative norms and the contemporary system of state control and administrative oversight. Drawing on the classical doctrine modern European standards of good governance, it is shown that control and oversight serve as structural guarantees of legality, preventing deviations from administrative procedures and securing effective protection of rights and freedoms. In today’s environment, these mechanisms acquire additional significance as safeguards against arbitrary governance, corruption risks, and procedural distortions.

A separate analytical focus is placed on the procedural, organizational, and technological conditions necessary for effective administrative norm-realization. It is demonstrated that implementation is inseparable from a unified administrative-procedural framework, coherent inter-agency coordination, professional public service, and digital instruments of public administration. The article highlights that modern administrative governance requires a combination of rule-based decision-making, operational flexibility, and embedded mechanisms of responsibility and transparency.

The study proposes a generalized model of administrative norm-realization suitable for contemporary Ukrainian conditions — one that integrates legal certainty, national security needs, control and oversight functions, digital governance instruments, and the principles of good administration. This model forms an essential component of the broader modernization of administrative law and public governance in Ukraine, particularly in the context of war and post-war reconstruction.

Keywords: administrative law; implementation of norms; administrative procedure; state control; administrative oversight; national security; martial law; public administration; administrative discretion; rule of law; accountability; resilience of public authority.

 References

1. Averianov V. B. Shliakhy formuvannia novoi doktryny ukrainskoho administratyvnoho prava . Pravova derzhava. Vypusk 17. Kyiv: In-t derzhavy i prava im. M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy, 2006. S. 158–166 (in Ukr.).
2. Skrypniuk O. V. Teoretyko-pravovi zasady zabezpechennia derzhavnoho suverenitetu v Ukraini. Pravove zabezpechennia derzhavnoho suverenitetu Ukrainy. Kyiv, 2011 (in Ukr.).
3. Averianov V. B. Doktrynalni zasady suchasnoho rozvytku i reformuvannia ukrainskoho administratyvnoho prava. Vykonavcha vlada i administratyvne pravo / red.: V. B. Averianova. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi Dim «In-Yure», 2002. S. 60–72 (in Ukr.).
4. Skrypniuk V., Bezzubov D. O. Zabezpechennia efektyvnosti derzhavnoho upravlinnia yak sotsialna tsinnist administratyvnoho prava. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2025. T. 32, № 3. P. 164–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31359/1993-0909-2025-32-3-164 (in Ukr.).
5. Reformuvannia derzhavnoho upravlinnia v Ukraini: problemy i perspektyvy / kol. avt.; nauk. ker. V. Tsvietkov. Kyiv: Oriiany, 1998. 364 s. (in Ukr.).
6. Vykonavcha vlada i administratyvne pravo / za red. V. B. Averianova. Kyiv: In-Yure, 2002. 668 s. (in Ukr.).
7. Averianov V. B., Andriiko O. F. Vykonavcha vlada i derzhavnyi kontrol. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola prava pry Instytuti derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy, 1999. S. 9–21 (in Ukr.).
8. Bezzubov Dmytro, Skrypniuk Oleksandr, Filippov Artem Legal constants for ensuring national security in the context of the crisis in international Visegrad Journal on Human Rights. 2025. № 2. Р. 13–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2025.2.2
9. Pro kontrrozviduvalnu diialnist: Zakon Ukrainy 12.2002 № 374-IV. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 2003. № 12. St. 89. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/374-15#top (in Ukr.).
10. Pro rozvidku: Zakon Ukrainy vid 10.10.2024 № 4019-IX. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/912-20#Text (in Ukr.).

Дата першого надходження рукопису до видання: 02.01.2026
Дата прийнятого до друку рукопису після рецензування: 09.04.2026
Дата публікації: 30.04.2026